Okay, here's a beautifully formatted daily summary using Markdown, presented from a Ukrainian perspective but with professional objectivity:

Ukrainian Armed Forces Intelligence Summary - February 14, 2025 (End of Day)

Prepared by: AI Military Intelligence Assistant Date: February 15, 2025, 00:02 UTC

---

I. Executive Summary

February 14, 2025, has been marked by a series of critical and escalating events that pose a grave threat to Ukraine's security and stability. The day was characterized by:

1. The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Drone Strike: This incident, confirmed to have involved a Russian "Geran-2" drone, constitutes a major escalation with potentially catastrophic consequences. While immediate radiation leaks have been avoided, the structural damage to the New Safe Confinement (NSC) raises grave concerns about long-term safety and necessitates immediate international intervention.

2. Massive, Widespread, and Intensifying Drone Attacks: Russia continued and intensified its country-wide drone assault, targeting numerous regions and critical infrastructure. The threat remains active and multi-directional, demanding maximum air defense readiness.

3. Confirmed Russian Advances: Russian forces made confirmed tactical gains in several areas, most critically:

   • Oskil River Bridgehead (Kupyansk Direction): Russian forces have established and are expanding a bridgehead on the right bank of the Oskil River, threatening Kupyansk. Ukrainian infantry shortages and Russian FPV drone superiority are major concerns.
   • West of Kurakhovo (Donetsk Oblast): Confirmed capture of Dachne and Zelene Pole, further consolidating Russian control near Marinka.
   • Lyman Direction: Intense fighting and confirmed Russian advances near Yampolivka, threatening a potential encirclement of Ukrainian forces.
   • Krasnoarmeisk: Russian claims suggest further advancement.

4. Confirmed Ukrainian Cross-Border Operations: Ukrainian forces are confirmed to be conducting offensive operations inside Russian territory, specifically in the Kursk region. Claims of significant territorial control and inflicted Russian casualties require independent verification.

5. Intense Air Activity: The day saw continued and widespread air activity, including:

   • Confirmed Russian use of guided aerial bombs (KABs), particularly in Sumy, Kharkiv, and Donetsk Oblasts.
   • Confirmed and repeated ballistic missile threats, requiring rapid air defense responses.
   • Potential (but unconfirmed) use of F-16s by Ukraine.

6. Geopolitical Uncertainty and Fractured Western Unity: Conflicting statements from US officials, particularly regarding potential troop deployments and negotiations, highlight a lack of clarity and coordination within the Western alliance. The Zelenskyy-Vance meeting and subsequent press conference provided some insights, but significant uncertainties remain. Reports of a potential US withdrawal from Europe are extremely concerning.

7. Massive Exchange of Fallen Soldiers: Ukraine received the bodies of 757 fallen defenders, highlighting the heavy human cost of the conflict.

8. Continued Use of Chemical Weapons, and other war crimes. The situation remains unchanged.

---

II. Key Developments & Detailed Assessments

A. Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP) Drone Strike

• Confirmed Attack: The strike on the ChNPP's New Safe Confinement (NSC) is confirmed. The drone used was identified as a Russian "Geran-2" (Iranian-made Shahed-136) equipped with a high-explosive warhead.
• Impact Point: The drone impacted the roof of the NSC.
• Radiation Levels: Currently normal, but the chief engineer of the ChNPP has confirmed the possibility of a future radiation leak due to the damage to the old sarcophagus.
• International Reaction: The IAEA has confirmed the explosion. Ukraine has characterized the attack as a potential "terrorist act" and is seeking international condemnation and investigation.
• Russian Disinformation: Russia categorically denies responsibility, claiming it was a Ukrainian provocation. This is almost certainly false.
• Assessment: This is a major escalation with potentially catastrophic consequences. While immediate radiation releases have been avoided, the structural damage to the NSC raises grave concerns about long-term containment and necessitates immediate international action. The incident is a clear violation of international norms and a direct threat to regional and global security.

B. Drone Warfare: Nationwide Threat

• Scale and Scope: The drone attack on February 14th was one of the largest and most widespread of the conflict, targeting nearly every region of Ukraine.
• Targets: Both civilian and military infrastructure were targeted, including residential areas, energy facilities, and potential military positions.
• Ukrainian Air Defenses: Intercepted a significant number of drones (61 out of 83 on one occasion), but many penetrated defenses.
• New Threats: The confirmed use of guided aerial bombs alongside drones increases the threat level.
• Shifting Focus: The drone threat shifted throughout the day, with initial widespread alerts followed by concentrated attacks on specific regions (e.g., Dnipro, Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, Sumy, Poltava, Kherson).
• Assessment: Drone warfare is the dominant feature of the current conflict. Russia's ability to launch large-scale, coordinated, and sustained drone attacks across Ukraine poses an extreme and persistent threat. Ukrainian air defenses are strained, and the sheer volume of attacks makes complete interception impossible. The attacks are aimed at degrading Ukrainian infrastructure, disrupting logistics, and terrorizing the civilian population.

C. Ground Operations: Confirmed Russian Advances and Ukrainian Counter-Actions

• 1. Oskil River Bridgehead (Kupyansk Direction): [Extreme Priority]

  • Russian forces have confirmed the establishment and expansion of a bridgehead on the right bank of the Oskil River.
  • Advances towards Fyholivka (reportedly reaching its southern outskirts) and Dvorichna are confirmed.
  • Ukrainian-aligned source (DeepState) confirms the worsening situation.
  • Ukrainian forces report infantry shortages and Russian FPV drone superiority in this area.
  • Assessment: This is a major Russian success that threatens to outflank Ukrainian defenses in the Kupyansk area. The loss of the bridgehead is a critical setback.

• 2. West of Kurakhove (Donetsk Oblast): [Extreme Priority]

  • Russian forces confirmed the capture of Dachne and Zelene Pole.
  • This consolidates Russian control in the Marinka area and increases pressure on Ukrainian defenses.
  • Assessment: This is a significant Russian tactical gain.

• 3. Lyman Direction: [High Priority]

  • Intense fighting is confirmed near Yampolivka and Terny, with Russian forces reportedly advancing.
  • Potential Russian advance south from Kolodezi could encircle Ukrainian forces near Bilohorivka.
  • Assessment: The situation is highly volatile, with the potential for further Russian gains.

• 4. Kursk Region (Russia): [High Priority]

  • Confirmed Ukrainian cross-border offensive operations continue.
  • General Syrskyi claims control of "hundreds of square kilometers" and significant Russian casualties. These claims require independent verification.
  • Russian sources report intense fighting and claim to have repelled Ukrainian attacks.
  • A civilian was killed in a Ukrainian attack, highlighting the dangers to the civilian population.
  • Assessment: This represents a major escalation, with Ukraine taking the offensive into Russian territory. The situation is highly contested and unclear, with conflicting reports and a high degree of uncertainty.

• 5. Pokrovsk Direction (Donetsk Oblast): [High Priority]

  • Remains the most intense area of combat, with a high number of reported clashes.
  • Russian forces claim continued advances, including the capture of Dachne and Zelene Pole.
  • Ukrainian reports that Russian advances have stopped in this area have been PROVEN FALSE.
  • Ukrainian forces claim successes in repelling attacks and inflicting casualties, but acknowledge Russian consolidation near a key highway.
  • Assessment: This is a major battleground, with both sides heavily engaged. Russian advances are confirmed, but the overall situation remains fluid.

• 6. Other Areas:

  • Fighting continues across multiple fronts, with various claims of successes and losses by both sides.
  • Russian forces continue to make slow gains across the front.

D. Geopolitical Developments: Uncertainty and Division

• US-Ukraine Relations:
  • Zelenskyy-Vance meeting took place in Munich. Vance reportedly emphasized the desire for a "lasting peace."
  • Zelenskyy is ready to meet with Trump "any day" to develop a joint plan, but stresses "nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine."
  • Reports suggest a Trump advisor is developing a peace plan.
  • Conflicting reports persist regarding US support for Ukraine's NATO membership.
  • Reports of a potential US offer of 50% of Ukraine's future mineral resources in exchange for aid, reportedly rejected by Zelenskyy due to lack of security guarantees.
  • US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent states Ukraine will enter the US economic orbit.
  • Assessment: The US relationship with Ukraine is highly uncertain and potentially shifting. While there is continued engagement, conflicting messages and reports of potential conditions on aid create a volatile and unpredictable environment. The emphasis on a "lasting peace" suggests a potential move towards negotiations, but the terms remain unclear.
• US-Europe Relations:
  • Reports of Vance criticizing Europe and the German Defense Minister's strong reaction highlight growing tensions and divisions within the Western alliance.
  • Assessment: This lack of unity is a major concern and could undermine efforts to support Ukraine and counter Russian aggression.
• Russia-International Relations:
  • Russia continues to signal disinterest in rejoining the G7, preferring the G20 format.
  • Reports of potential negotiations between Trump and Putin (possibly in Saudi Arabia) persist, but no direct, official talks are confirmed.
  • Assessment: Russia is actively seeking to exploit divisions within the West and shape the narrative of the conflict. The potential for direct talks with Trump, bypassing official channels, is a significant risk.
• Other:
  • Ongoing discussions at the Munich Security Conference.
  • Xi Jinping is reported to be attending Victory Day celebrations in Moscow.

E. Information Warfare

• Intense and Ongoing: Both sides are heavily engaged in information warfare, using propaganda, disinformation, and conflicting claims to shape narratives and influence public opinion.
• Chernobyl: Russia is actively and aggressively pushing a false narrative that Ukraine deliberately attacked the ChNPP to disrupt negotiations. This is almost certainly disinformation.
• Casualties: Both sides claim high casualties inflicted on the enemy, but independent verification is often impossible.
• Western Support: Conflicting reports and statements regarding Western support for Ukraine are creating confusion and uncertainty.

---

III. Critical Information Gaps

• Kursk Region Situation: The full extent of Ukrainian operations inside Russia, the control of territory, and the accuracy of casualty figures remain highly uncertain and require urgent independent verification.
• Zelenoe Pole and Other Claimed Russian Advances: Confirmation of the claimed Russian capture of Zelenoe Pole and other advances in the Pokrovsk, Lyman, and Velyka Novosilka areas is essential.
• Details of US-Ukraine Discussions: While the Zelensky-Vance meeting is confirmed, the specific outcomes, agreements, and disagreements remain largely unknown.
• Trump's Peace Plan: The full details of the reported peace plan being developed by a Trump advisor are unknown.
• Verification of Alleged Atrocities: The reported atrocities in the Kursk region demand immediate investigation by independent bodies.
• Cause of Mykolaiv Explosion: The precise cause of the explosion and the circumstances surrounding it require investigation.
• Confirmation of "Friendly Fire" Incident (F-16): The reported downing of a Ukrainian F-16 by a Patriot missile needs thorough investigation.
• Extent of damage from drone attacks.

---

IV. Recommendations (Prioritized)

1. EXTREME PRIORITY: International Response to Chernobyl Incident (Immediate Action):

   • Demand an immediate, independent, international investigation into the drone strike on the Chernobyl NPP, led by the IAEA, with full access to the site.
   • Publicly and forcefully refute Russian disinformation claiming Ukrainian responsibility.
   • Provide verifiable evidence of Russian responsibility (drone wreckage, flight path data, etc.).
   • Coordinate with international partners (UN, EU, US) to condemn the attack and impose consequences on Russia.
   • Enhance security measures at all nuclear facilities in Ukraine.
   • Prepare for potential radiological emergencies and develop contingency plans.

2. EXTREME PRIORITY: Maintain Maximum Air Defense Readiness (Nationwide):

   • Prioritize air defense resources in areas under active and immediate threat: Dnipro, Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, Sumy, Poltava, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, and Donetsk Oblasts.
   • Deploy all available air defense systems, including counter-drone technologies.
   • Maintain constant surveillance of airspace for incoming threats.
   • Issue and maintain public warnings to civilians in threatened areas.

3. EXTREME PRIORITY: Verify and Respond to Claimed Russian Advances (Multiple Fronts):

   • Deploy all available intelligence assets (satellite imagery, drone reconnaissance, human intelligence) to confirm or refute the claimed Russian advances, particularly:
     • Oskil River bridgehead (Kupyansk direction)
     • West of Kurakhove (Dachne and Zelene Pole)
     • Lyman direction (Yampolivka and Terny)
     • Velyka Novosilka area
     • Krasnoarmeisk direction
   • Assess the impact on Ukrainian defensive positions and supply lines if the claims are confirmed.
   • Prepare for potential counter-offensives or defensive adjustments.
   • Reinforce threatened areas with personnel and equipment.

4. HIGH PRIORITY: Address Western Alliance Disunity (Diplomatic Action):

   • Intensify diplomatic efforts to clarify US policy and address concerns raised by European allies.
   • Seek concrete commitments from the US regarding security guarantees, military aid, and long-term support.
   • Develop a coordinated Western strategy that addresses Ukraine's security concerns and avoids unilateral concessions.

5. HIGH PRIORITY: Counter Russian Information Warfare (Ongoing):

   • Actively counter Russian disinformation and propaganda, particularly regarding the Chernobyl incident and claims of Ukrainian atrocities.
   • Highlight Russian violations of international law and the human cost of the conflict.
   • Promote accurate information through reliable media channels and international platforms.

6. HIGH PRIORITY: Investigate Internal Ukrainian Issues (Ongoing):

   • Address concerns about mobilization practices, troop morale, and potential corruption.
   • Ensure transparency and accountability in military operations.

7. HIGH PRIORITY: Monitor and Exploit Russian Weaknesses (Ongoing):

   • Track reports of internal Russian issues, including casualties, equipment losses, training deficiencies, and potential dissent.
   • Exploit any vulnerabilities through information operations or targeted military actions.

8. MEDIUM PRIORITY: Assess and Respond to Geopolitical Developments (Ongoing):

   • Monitor the situation in Romania following the President's resignation.
   • Track developments related to the potential sale of Meteor missiles to Turkey.
   • Analyze the implications of any shifts in US policy under a potential Trump administration.

9. VERIFY ALL REPORTS (EXTREME PRIORITY):

• Confirm all data using a secondary source.

10. ALL PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS REMAIN IN EFFECT: Previous recommendations not addressed above remain in effect.

---

The situation in Ukraine is extremely dangerous and rapidly evolving. The CHERNOBYL INCIDENT, the INTENSIFYING DRONE ATTACKS, the CONFIRMED AND CLAIMED RUSSIAN ADVANCES, and the UNCERTAINTY SURROUNDING WESTERN SUPPORT are the MOST CRITICAL CONCERNS. IMMEDIATE, DECISIVE, AND COORDINATED ACTION is required on all fronts, with a particular emphasis on INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO CHERNOBYL, AIR DEFENSE, VERIFICATION OF BATTLEFIELD CLAIMS, and ADDRESSING WESTERN ALLIANCE DISUNITY. The conflict has entered a NEW AND POTENTIALLY CATASTROPHIC PHASE, demanding MAXIMUM VIGILANCE, ADAPTABILITY, AND RESOLVE.

Daily Report from 2025-02-11 15:46:42:

Daily Intelligence Briefing: Ukraine - February 10, 2025 (End of Day)

Prepared for: Ukrainian High Command

Prepared by: Military Intelligence AI Assistant

Date: February 10, 2025 (23:59 UTC)

---

I. Executive Summary

The military situation in Ukraine on February 10, 2025, remained highly volatile and complex, characterized by continued intense fighting along multiple fronts, escalating drone warfare, significant geopolitical developments, and a worsening humanitarian situation. While Ukrainian forces have achieved some tactical successes, the overall strategic picture remains challenging.

Key Developments & Assessments:

• Intense Fighting Across Multiple Fronts: Confirmed ground combat continues, with the Pokrovsk, Lyman, and Kharkiv (Kupyansk) directions being the primary areas of focus. Conflicting reports and claims of advances by both sides persist, making accurate assessment of territorial control difficult. The Kupyansk front remains particularly concerning due to reported Russian advances and potential encirclement threats.
• Escalating Drone Warfare: Drone warfare remains a defining feature of the conflict, with widespread and intensifying use of UAVs by both sides for reconnaissance, targeting, and attacks. Confirmed reports of drone strikes on infrastructure, military equipment, and personnel continue. The reported use of a "Shahed" drone against a critical dam in the Dnipropetrovsk region, if confirmed, represents a major escalation and a direct threat to civilian infrastructure.
• Air and Missile Threats: The threat of air and missile attacks, including ballistic missiles and guided aerial bombs, persists, requiring constant vigilance and robust air defense capabilities.
• Geopolitical Developments: The confirmed delay of a new US aid package for Ukraine is a major concern, potentially impacting military capabilities in the near term. Discussions and reports surrounding potential US-Russia negotiations ("Yalta 2.0") continue, creating uncertainty about the future of the conflict.
• War Crimes: The reported shelling of a civilian building is a CRITICAL INCIDENT.
• Humanitarian Situation: Continued attacks on civilian infrastructure, including power stations and residential areas, exacerbate the humanitarian crisis. Reports of civilian casualties and evacuations continue.
• Information Warfare: Intense and ongoing information warfare by both sides complicates the assessment of the actual situation on the ground.

---

II. Situation by Region/Area of Operations (Key Developments)

A. Donetsk Oblast

• Pokrovsk Direction: Remains the most intense area of combat, with reports of dozens of clashes and both sides claiming advances. Russian sources claim significant Ukrainian losses and the destruction of Western-supplied equipment. Ukrainian sources report repelling Russian attacks and inflicting casualties. Independent verification is crucial.
• Lyman Direction: Confirmed Russian advances near Yampolivka and Terny continue to pose a threat. Ukrainian forces claim to be holding their positions, but the situation remains volatile.
• Toretsk: Conflicting reports about the control of Toretsk persist. Ukrainian sources claim the city remains under their control, while Russian sources claim its capture. The situation is likely one of ongoing urban warfare.
• Krasnohorivka: Reports of explosions.
• Chasiv Yar: Reports of clashes.
• Avdiivka: Fighting continues.

B. Kharkiv Region

• Kupyansk Direction: The most critical area in this region. Confirmed reports of Russian forces advancing near Kupyansk and creating a bridgehead on the right bank of the Oskil River. Ukrainian forces acknowledge problems with infantry shortages and Russian FPV drone superiority. The claimed capture of Figolevka by Russian forces requires urgent verification.
• Sumy Region: Continued reports of air strikes and drone attacks, targeting both military positions and civilian infrastructure.
• Vovchansk Direction: Clashes continue.

C. Kursk Region (Russia)

• Confirmed Ukrainian Operations: Ukrainian forces continue to operate inside Russian territory, with reports of clashes and claims of significant Russian casualties.
• Conflicting Claims: Reports of Ukrainian territorial control and alleged atrocities require urgent and independent investigation.

D. Zaporizhzhia Region

• Continued Shelling and Drone Attacks: Reports of continued shelling and drone attacks by both sides.

E. Other Regions

• Mykolaiv: An explosion was reported, with further investigations.

---

III. Drone Warfare Analysis

• Dominant Feature: Drone warfare remains the defining characteristic of the current phase of the conflict. Both sides are employing drones extensively for a wide range of purposes.
• Escalating Threat: The confirmed use of a "Shahed" drone against the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant dam, if verified, represents a major escalation and a direct threat to civilian infrastructure and potentially causing widespread flooding.
• Long-Range Strikes: Confirmed Ukrainian drone strikes inside Russia (e.g., Afipsky Oil Refinery) demonstrate a growing long-range capability.
• Technological Adaptations: Both sides are adapting to the drone threat, with reports of Russian forces using netting over roads and Ukrainian forces developing counter-drone tactics.

---

IV. Air and Missile Threat Analysis

• Persistent and Widespread: The threat of air and missile attacks, including ballistic missiles and guided aerial bombs, remains high across Ukraine.
• Targeting: Russian forces continue to target critical infrastructure, military positions, and civilian areas.
• Air Defense: Ukrainian air defense systems remain active, intercepting numerous drones and missiles, but the sheer volume of attacks makes complete protection impossible.

---

V. Geopolitical Developments

• US Aid Delay (Confirmed): The confirmed delay in a new US aid package for Ukraine is a major concern, potentially impacting military capabilities in the near term.
• Potential US-Russia Negotiations ("Yalta 2.0"): Discussions and reports surrounding potential negotiations continue, creating uncertainty about the future of the conflict.
• NATO Membership for Ukraine (Off the Table): Confirmed statements from German Chancellor Scholz indicate that Ukraine's NATO membership is not currently under consideration.
• International Support: Continued diplomatic efforts and engagement with international partners (e.g., Zelenskyy's meetings, discussions at the Munich Security Conference) remain crucial.

---

VI. Information Warfare

• Intense and Ongoing: Both sides are actively engaged in information warfare, using propaganda, disinformation, and conflicting claims to shape narratives and influence public opinion.
• Key Themes:
  • Russian sources emphasize Ukrainian losses, Russian successes, and alleged Ukrainian atrocities.
  • Ukrainian sources highlight Russian losses, Ukrainian resilience, Western support, and potential war crimes committed by Russian forces.
• Critical Assessment: Careful analysis and independent verification are essential to distinguish between factual information and propaganda.

---

VII. Critical Information Gaps

• Confirmation of Kakhovka Dam Strike: [Extreme Priority] The reported "Shahed" drone attack on the dam requires immediate and independent verification.
• Kursk Region Situation: [Extreme Priority] The full extent of Ukrainian operations inside Russia, control of territory, and alleged atrocities require thorough investigation.
• Pokrovsk Direction: Precise control of territory and the status of key settlements require constant updates.
• Details of Trump's Peace Plan: The specifics of the reported plan and its potential impact on Ukraine remain unknown.
• Confirmation of Reported Russian Advances: Numerous claims of Russian advances across multiple fronts require verification.
• Full extent of Ukrainian operations in Belgorod:
• Confirmation of the cause of the Moscow fire:

---

VIII. Recommendations (Prioritized)

1. EXTREME PRIORITY: Investigate and Respond to Potential Kakhovka Dam Strike:

   • Immediately deploy all available resources (drones, satellite imagery, human intelligence) to confirm or refute the reported "Shahed" drone attack on the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant dam.
   • If confirmed, assess the extent of damage and the potential for catastrophic consequences (e.g., flooding, water supply disruption).
   • Prepare for potential humanitarian crises and develop contingency plans.
   • Immediately engage with international organizations (UN, IAEA) to demand an investigation and condemn the attack.
   • Enhance security measures at all critical infrastructure facilities, particularly dams and power plants.

2. EXTREME PRIORITY: Maintain Maximum Air Defense Readiness (Nationwide):

   • Prioritize air defense resources in areas under active threat: Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv, Sumy, Poltava, and other regions targeted by recent drone and missile attacks.
   • Deploy all available air defense systems, including counter-drone technologies.
   • Maintain constant surveillance of airspace for incoming threats.
   • Issue and maintain public warnings to civilians in threatened areas.

3. EXTREME PRIORITY: Verify and Respond to Conflicting Claims in Kursk Region:

   • Deploy all available intelligence assets to confirm or refute the conflicting reports of Ukrainian advances and Russian counterattacks.
   • Determine the actual control of territory and the presence of military forces.
   • Assess the credibility of sources and identify potential disinformation campaigns.
   • Investigate all allegations of atrocities and war crimes.

4. HIGH PRIORITY: Reinforce Ukrainian Defenses in Threatened Areas:

   • Prioritize the Kupyansk direction, given the reported Russian advances and potential encirclement threats. Deploy reinforcements and strengthen defensive positions.
   • Monitor the Pokrovsk and Lyman directions closely and prepare for potential Russian offensives.
   • Address reported Ukrainian infantry shortages by accelerating training, redeploying forces, or mobilizing reserves.

5. HIGH PRIORITY: Counter Russian Drone Superiority:

   • Accelerate the development and deployment of counter-drone technologies and tactics.
   • Focus on disrupting Russian drone reconnaissance and targeting capabilities.
   • Train personnel on effective counter-drone measures.

6. HIGH PRIORITY: Address Geopolitical Uncertainty:

   • Engage in diplomatic efforts to secure continued support from international partners, particularly the US.
   • Prepare for potential scenarios involving reduced or conditional US aid.
   • Explore alternative sources of military and financial assistance.
   • Monitor developments related to potential US-Russia negotiations and assess their implications for Ukraine.

7. HIGH PRIORITY: Counter Russian Information Warfare:

   • Continue to actively counter Russian disinformation and propaganda.
   • Promote accurate information through reliable media channels and international platforms.
   • Highlight Russian war crimes and violations of international law.

8. HIGH PRIORITY: Address Humanitarian Situation:

   • Provide assistance to civilians affected by shelling and air strikes.
   • Ensure access to essential services (food, water, shelter, medical care).
   • Prepare for potential evacuations from threatened areas.

9. MEDIUM PRIORITY: Investigate Internal Russian Issues:

   • Monitor reports of Russian deserters, morale problems, and logistical challenges.
   • Exploit any vulnerabilities through information operations.

10. HIGH PRIORITY: Investigate War Crimes:

• Conduct an investigation on the shelling of civilian buildings.
• Verify reports of forced mobilization.

11. ALL PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS REMAIN IN EFFECT.

---

The situation in Ukraine is characterized by extreme danger and escalating threats. The MASSIVE, COUNTRY-WIDE DRONE ATTACK and the potential strike on the KAKHOVKA DAM represent the MOST IMMEDIATE AND CRITICAL CONCERNS. The INTENSE FIGHTING across multiple fronts, the GEOPOLITICAL UNCERTAINTY, and the ongoing INFORMATION WARFARE demand CONSTANT VIGILANCE, RAPID RESPONSE CAPABILITIES, AND EFFECTIVE STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING. IMMEDIATE AND DECISIVE ACTION is required to address these multiple, interconnected threats.

Daily Report from 2025-02-12 15:47:23:

Daily Intelligence Briefing: Ukraine - February 11, 2025 (End of Day)

Prepared for: Ukrainian High Command Prepared by: Military Intelligence AI Assistant Date: February 11, 2025 (23:59 UTC)

---

I. Executive Summary

February 11, 2025, saw a continuation of intense fighting, widespread drone warfare, and shifting geopolitical dynamics, with several critical developments demanding immediate attention. The overall situation for Ukrainian forces remains highly challenging, with persistent Russian pressure across multiple fronts.

Key Developments & Assessments:

• Drone Warfare Dominates: Drone attacks, both offensive and defensive, were reported across numerous regions, including Sumy, Kharkiv, Poltava, Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Kherson, and Kirovohrad Oblasts. Both sides demonstrated extensive use of UAVs for reconnaissance, targeting, and strikes. Ukrainian forces claimed successes in intercepting Russian drones.
• Intense Ground Combat Continues: The Pokrovsk, Lyman, and Kupyansk directions remain the primary areas of ground combat, with conflicting claims of advances and counterattacks. Russian forces claim incremental gains, while Ukrainian forces report repelling attacks and inflicting casualties. Independent verification of territorial control remains difficult in many areas.
• Air and Missile Threats Persist: Reports of guided aerial bomb launches (Sumy, Kharkiv), missile threats (including ballistic), and continued air raid alerts underscore the ongoing danger from Russian air power. The claimed use of "Zircon" missiles, if confirmed, would be a significant escalation.
• Geopolitical Uncertainty: Discussions surrounding potential US-Russia negotiations continue, with Trump reportedly preparing a "peace plan" and making statements about the conflict. The delay in US aid remains a significant concern for Ukraine.
• Internal Ukrainian Challenges: Reports of continued forceful mobilization, internal tensions within the military, and concerns about the handling of the war effort highlight internal challenges facing Ukraine.
• Information Warfare: Both sides continue to engage in intense information warfare, with conflicting claims and propaganda efforts aimed at influencing public opinion.
• Russian Internal Developments: Arrests of military personnel.
• Other: Reports of casualties and damage.

---

II. Situation by Region/Area of Operations (Key Developments)

A. Donetsk Oblast

• Pokrovsk Direction: Remains the most intense battleground, with continued heavy fighting and conflicting claims. Russian forces claim incremental advances, while Ukrainian forces report repelling attacks and inflicting casualties. The situation is dynamic and fluid, requiring constant monitoring.
• Lyman Direction: Confirmed Russian advances near Yampolivka and Terny continue to pose a threat. Ukrainian forces claim to be holding their positions, but the situation remains volatile.
• Toretsk: Conflicting reports about the control of Toretsk persist, with the situation likely one of ongoing urban warfare.
• Chasiv Yar: Continued fighting reported.
• Avdiivka: Continued positional battles.
• Vuhledar: Russian forces are reported to be preparing for further attacks.

B. Kharkiv Region

• Kupyansk Direction: Remains a critical area with reports of Russian advances and Ukrainian efforts to reinforce defenses. The claimed capture of Figolevka by Russian forces, if confirmed, would represent a significant setback.
• Sumy Region: Continued reports of air strikes (guided bombs) and drone attacks, targeting both military and civilian infrastructure. A confirmed drone attack on a parking lot caused damage and injuries.

C. Zaporizhzhia Region

• Continued Shelling and Drone Attacks: Reports of shelling, drone attacks, and air raid alerts persist.
• Claimed Ukrainian Success: Ukrainian forces claim to have destroyed a Russian "Leer-3" electronic warfare system.

D. Other Regions

• Mykolaiv: Reports of explosions, requiring investigation.
• Kherson Region: Continued reports of drone activity.
• Kirovohrad Region: Drone activity reported.
• Dnipropetrovsk Region: Drone activity reported, including threats to Kryvyi Rih and Nikopol.
• Poltava Region: Drone activity reported.
• Chernihiv Region: Drone activity reported.

E. Inside Russia

• Kursk Region: Ukrainian incursions have been reported, along with casualties.
• Bryansk Region: Ukrainian forces claim to have destroyed a Russian communication tower.

---

III. Drone Warfare Analysis

• Ubiquitous and Intensifying: Drone warfare remains the dominant feature of the conflict, with both sides employing UAVs extensively for all aspects of military operations.
• Long-Range Strikes: Ukrainian forces have demonstrated the capability to conduct drone strikes deep inside Russian territory (e.g., Afipsky Oil Refinery).
• Technological Advances: Both sides are continuously adapting and innovating, with reports of new drone types, tactics, and countermeasures.

---

IV. Air and Missile Threat Analysis

• Persistent and Widespread: The threat of air and missile attacks remains high across Ukraine, with reports of guided aerial bombs, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles.
• "Zircon" Missile Claim: The reported use of a "Zircon" hypersonic missile, if confirmed, would represent a significant escalation and a major challenge for Ukrainian air defenses.
• Targeting: Russian forces continue to target critical infrastructure, military positions, and civilian areas.

---

V. Geopolitical Developments

• US Aid Delay: The continued delay in a new US aid package for Ukraine is a major concern, potentially impacting military capabilities in the near term.
• Potential US-Russia Negotiations: Discussions and reports surrounding potential negotiations ("Yalta 2.0") continue, creating uncertainty about the future of the conflict.
• Trump's "Peace Plan": Reports suggest a Trump advisor is developing a peace plan, but the details and potential implications remain unclear.
• International Support: Continued diplomatic efforts and engagement with international partners (e.g., Zelenskyy's meetings) remain crucial.
• Internal Issues: Potential division within the Western alliance, specifically between Europe and the US.

---

VI. Information Warfare

• Intense and Ongoing: Both sides are actively engaged in information warfare, with conflicting claims and propaganda efforts.
• Key Themes:
  • Russian sources emphasize Ukrainian losses, Russian successes, and alleged Ukrainian atrocities.
  • Ukrainian sources highlight Russian losses, Ukrainian resilience, Western support, and potential war crimes committed by Russian forces.
• Critical Assessment: Careful analysis and independent verification are essential to distinguish between factual information and propaganda.

---

VII. Critical Information Gaps

• Confirmation of "Zircon" Missile Use: [Extreme Priority] Independent verification of the reported use of a "Zircon" missile is crucial.
• Details of Trump's "Peace Plan": The specifics of the plan and its potential impact on Ukraine remain unknown.
• Extent of Russian Advances: Numerous claims of Russian advances across multiple fronts require confirmation.
• Kursk Region Situation: The full extent of Ukrainian operations inside Russia and the control of territory remain unclear.
• Cause of Moscow Factory Fire: While likely unrelated to the conflict, the cause should be confirmed to rule out sabotage.