Situation Report

OPSEC CLASSIFICATION: NATO SECRET // RELEASABLE TO UKR FORCES

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 07 JUN 25 / 17:12 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 07 JUN 25 / 16:42 ZULU - 07 JUN 25 / 17:12 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update (Unchanged from previous report unless specified): Kharkiv Oblast (Kharkiv City - Kyivskyi, Osnovyanskyi, Shevchenkivskyi Districts, suburbs, Kommunar factory, recreational park, children's railway), Volyn Oblast (Lutsk), Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Dnipro, oblast border, Kryvyi Rih, Pavlohrad, Pleshcheevka, Malinovka, Charivne, Mezheva community, Synelnykove district, Nikopol region), Zaporizhzhia Oblast (14 populated areas, Zaporozhye direction, Orikhiv, Huliaipole, Chervonne, Malinovka), Black Sea, Azov Sea, Sumy Oblast (Sumy direction, Yunakivka, Kondratovka, Alexandropol, Klymentove, Uhroyidy, Novonikolaevka, Pisarevka, Khotin, Vorochina, Nizhnya Duvanka), Russian Federation (Kursk, Bryansk, Kaluga, Smolensk Oblasts, Moscow Region including Dubna, Podmoskovye, Moscow city (Gorbushkin Dvor, VDNKh), Saratov Oblast - Engels; Tambov Oblast - Michurinsk; Ryazan Oblast - Dyagilevo; Belgorod Oblast - Prokhorovka-Belenikhino, Zhuravlevka, Pushkarozhadinsky, Azov - Rostov Oblast, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast - Kstovo, Sevastopol), Southern Donetsk Direction (Fedorivka, Perbudova, Komar, Maksimovka, Razdolnoye, Vorskresenka, Poddubnoye, Velyka Novosilka, Chasov Yar), Konstantinovka direction (Novoolenovka, Novaya Poltavka, Tarasovka, Ignatovka, Zarya), Siversk direction (Serebryanka, Hryhorivka, Bilohorivka, Verkhnokamyanske, Vyimka, Ivano-Daryivka, Pereizne), Odesa Oblast, Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk, Kurakhovo - Alekseevka, Chasov Yar, Kramatorsk axis, Toretsk axis, Novopavlivka axis, Krasnoarmeysk-Novosergeevka), Kupyansk axis (Zahryzove, Stepova Novoselivka), Kherson axis (Mykolayivka), Ternopil Oblast, Kyiv, Krasnoarmeysk direction, Lviv Oblast (Drohobych).

• Key Terrain (Kharkiv City): Civilian casualty count due to KAB strikes on recreational park and children's railway has increased significantly to 1 fatality (head of the Kharkiv Children's Railway) and over 40 injured. Emergency services continue debris removal and casualty evacuation. Zelenskiy confirms "brutal attack... no military sense. Pure terrorism." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Kupyansk Direction): Russian "Kontora" group claims destruction of a Ukrainian tank with drone footage showing the successful strike on a revetted position. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA, HIGH for video content showing strike and burning vehicle).

• Key Terrain (Shakhovo, Dobropolsky District, DNR - claimed): Russian milblogger "Voenkor Kotenok" claims Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS RF) struck a bridge, showing significant structural damage and a burning vehicle. This location, if confirmed, is strategically important for logistics. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA, HIGH for observed damage).

• Key Terrain (Undisclosed Urban Area - Artillery Strike): Video depicts multiple large explosions, consistent with artillery or missile strikes, in an urban/semi-urban environment. Speaker mentions "petals" (PFM-1 anti-personnel landmines) being dropped. The second explosion occurs close to the camera, causing glass shattering and visible damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for observed shelling and damage, MEDIUM for PFM-1 dispersal without visual confirmation of mines).

• Key Terrain (Vremevsky Direction): Russian "Voin DV" claims 305th Guards Artillery Brigade (Vostok Grouping) UAV operators destroyed a Ukrainian 2S22 "Bohdana" self-propelled howitzer. Video shows a precision strike and subsequent fire. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA, HIGH for video content showing strike and burning vehicle).

• Key Terrain (Ternopil, Western Ukraine): Russian milblogger "Dnevnik Desantnika" claims a "high-precision missile strike" destroyed an underground bunker with Western ammunition, showing a large fire and black smoke plume over an urban/industrial area with emergency vehicles. This is a deep strike in western Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of target, HIGH for observed large fire and emergency response).

• Key Terrain (Krasnolimanskoye Direction): Russian tactical maps indicate fortified areas ("Укрепления"), dragon's teeth ("Зубы дракона"), and trenches ("Рвы") along the line of contact, particularly near Katerinovka, Makeevka, and Novolyubovka. This highlights established Russian defensive lines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

• Key Terrain (Pushkino, Moscow Region, RF - Updated): The large warehouse fire, initially reported as 8,000 sq meters, has expanded to 21,000 sq meters, according to TASS. It is confirmed to involve oils and lubricants, and its impact on a highway is also noted. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Large-scale fires in Pushkino (Moscow Region) and Ternopil will generate significant smoke plumes, potentially impacting air quality and visibility for local aerial reconnaissance/drone operations, and straining local emergency services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Artillery/missile strikes observed in an urban area with "petals" (PFM-1 mines) will create a persistent hazard for both civilians and potential friendly ground operations due to mine contamination and debris. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): Air Force of Ukraine reports continued threat of Russian attack UAVs in Sumy Oblast. Ukrainian AD is under immense pressure in Kharkiv due to KABs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Emergency Services): Overwhelmed in Kharkiv, with photos and videos confirming active SES and National Police personnel responding to over 40 casualties and significant urban damage. They are also active at the Ternopil fire, indicating multi-front strain. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground Forces - Offensive Operations): Ukrainian General Staff released a video showcasing artillery (D-30, HIMARS-like MLRS) and drone operations, with ordnance inscribed "For Sumy" and "Burn in hell." Personnel explicitly mention operations in the Kursk direction. A captured Russian Naval Infantry patch ("810") is also shown. This indicates active, aggressive cross-border operations and PSYOPs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Deep Strike): SBU's "Operation Pavutina" drone strike on Tu-22M3 bomber and Kstovo oil refinery (previous report) remains a critical success. A correction was issued by CyberBoroshno regarding the Kstovo target, clarifying it was a modern processing unit, not an old bitumen plant. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Air): Confirmed continued KAB launches on Kharkiv. Russian VKS claimed a bridge strike near Shakhovo. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Ground - Sumy Axis): Basurin (DNR official) claims "our troops continue to expand the control zone in Sumy Oblast, fulfilling the order of the Commander-in-Chief on forming a buffer zone." This aligns with previous intelligence of Russian advances towards Sumy city. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim/propaganda, consistent with observed intent). Russian "Kontora" group operating drones on Kupyansk direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for drone operation)
• Russian Forces (Ground - Defensive Posture): Tactical maps show extensive fortifications (dragon's teeth, trenches) in the Krasnolimanskoye direction, indicating prepared and hardened defensive lines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Information Operations):
  • Margarita Simonyan (RT editor) and "Dnevnik Desantnika" continue to amplify the narrative that Kyiv refused to accept bodies of Ukrainian military personnel, attributing it to a desire to avoid compensation. "Dnevnik Desantnika" also released alleged lists of identified deceased Ukrainian personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russian MoD Deputy Defence Minister Aleksandr Fomin publicly stated Russia's readiness for body/POW exchange following Istanbul talks, blaming Kyiv for non-consent and delays. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • A Russian propaganda video requests civilian support for "transport vehicles," indicating potential logistical needs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russian milbloggers (Kotenok, Voin DV) continue to post BDA videos of claimed Ukrainian equipment destruction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Internal Security): The rapidly expanding fire in Pushkino, Moscow region, is a significant internal incident. Its cause is not confirmed, but its scale is escalating. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russia-China Relations: NYT reports on Russia's "soft" fight against Chinese espionage while trying not to alienate Beijing, and mentions an FSB counter-intelligence program "Antanta-4" aimed at preventing Chinese espionage. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - media report, high for Russian intent)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial (Precision Guided Munitions): Sustained and deliberate capability to deliver KABs on civilian targets in Kharkiv to inflict maximum psychological and physical damage. Claimed precision missile strike capability (Ternopil). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Aerial (Drones): Continued effective use of tactical drones for precision strikes on Ukrainian positions (Kupyansk, Vremevsky directions). Capability to launch attack UAVs (Sumy Oblast threat). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground (Combined Arms/Artillery/Drones): Capability to conduct ground offensives (Sumy axis) and maintain defensive lines (Krasnolimanskoye). Demonstrated ability to integrate drones and artillery for targeted strikes against Ukrainian armor and self-propelled artillery. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Area Denial (Mines): Demonstrated capability to disperse PFM-1 anti-personnel landmines in urban areas using artillery/rockets, posing a persistent threat to civilians and military operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: Highly coordinated and persistent capability to launch and amplify disinformation campaigns, particularly regarding humanitarian issues like POW/body exchanges, aimed at undermining Ukrainian credibility and demoralizing the population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Strategic (Long-Range Strikes): Continued capability to conduct deep strikes into Western Ukraine (Ternopil). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Kharkiv/Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia: Continue to terrorize civilian populations and overwhelm emergency services through indiscriminate aerial attacks. Intent to inflict maximum psychological damage by targeting non-military civilian sites, likely in retaliation for Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Sumy Axis: Intent to expand control in Sumy Oblast, likely aiming to create a "buffer zone" and threaten Sumy city, forcing Ukraine to divert resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Kupyansk/Vremevsky Directions: Maintain pressure on these axes, degrading Ukrainian armored and artillery capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: Undermine Ukrainian credibility, sow discord, and present Russia as a responsible actor while blaming Ukraine for failures (e.g., body exchange). Reinforce domestic morale and potentially coerce Ukraine into unfavorable exchanges. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Internal Security: Attempt to manage internal incidents (Pushkino fire) while also likely attempting to counter foreign espionage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (MLCOA - Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers, Infrastructure, and Deeper Targets, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation): Russia will intensify KAB and missile strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia, with an increased focus on civilian targets to maximize terror and drain Ukrainian emergency resources. Concurrently, Russia will conduct retaliatory deep strikes against military or critical infrastructure targets in Western Ukraine (e.g., Ternopil, as seen). This will be accompanied by a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges and blaming Ukraine for delays.
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Immediate increase in Kharkiv casualties, explicit targeting of recreational park, ongoing missile/drone threat in Sumy, claimed Ternopil strike, coordinated Russian media reports on body exchange.
  • COA 2 (Ground Offensive Intensification on Sumy and Donetsk Axes, with Integrated Air/Drone Support, Area Denial Tactics, and Enhanced Counter-UAV Measures): Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives, particularly on the Sumy axis (advancing towards Sumy city) and the Donetsk axis, aiming for tactical breakthroughs. They will continue to integrate air support (KABs), artillery, and FPV drones for targeted strikes against Ukrainian armor and artillery, while also actively employing area denial tactics (e.g., PFM-1 mines) and targeting Ukrainian drone operations to facilitate their advances. Defensive actions in border regions will escalate if Ukrainian pressure continues.
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Russian claims of expanding buffer zone in Sumy, Russian ground advances towards Sumy, Russian forces targeting Ukrainian UAV C2 and deployment points/armor, use of PFM-1 mines in urban areas, continued high number of combat engagements on Donetsk axis.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Increased Civilian Casualties as Explicit Objective: The extreme civilian impact in Kharkiv, with 40+ injured and explicit targeting of a children's railway/park, confirms a deliberate tactical shift towards maximizing terror and demoralizing civilians, likely in retaliation for Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Area Denial (PFM-1 Mines) in Urban Areas: The confirmed use of PFM-1 anti-personnel landmines in an urban setting suggests an adaptation to deny areas to civilians and complicate potential Ukrainian counter-operations, even at a high cost in terms of civilian suffering. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Targeting Ukrainian Self-Propelled Artillery: The claimed destruction of a Ukrainian "Bohdana" SPA suggests a focus on neutralizing Ukraine's longer-range artillery capabilities, which have proven effective in recent operations. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim)
• Enhanced Information Operations on Humanitarian Issues: The highly coordinated and specific Russian narrative regarding Ukraine refusing bodies, including the release of alleged lists, indicates a sophisticated and morally aggressive information warfare adaptation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Continued high rate of KAB usage, missile launches, and FPV drone operations indicates sustained, though potentially strained, supply chains for these munitions. The claimed Ternopil strike, if confirmed as a successful munitions depot hit, would significantly impact Ukrainian logistics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The large warehouse fire in Pushkino, affecting PMM (fuel/lubricants) and gas cylinders, escalating to 21,000 sq meters, represents a significant and potentially prolonged localized logistical disruption within the Russian Federation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian propaganda's explicit request for "transport vehicles" suggests potential ongoing logistical deficiencies or a desire to significantly expand transport capabilities at the civilian expense. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - based on propaganda, but consistent with long-standing issues).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 demonstrates continued ability to coordinate multi-domain strikes (KABs, missiles, tactical drones) across multiple oblasts, including deep rear strikes and border areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian C2 over ground forces appears to be effectively managing offensive operations (Sumy axis) and maintaining hardened defensive lines (Krasnolimanskoye). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The coordinated, sustained disinformation campaign on the body exchange issue, including high-level MoD statements, highlights effective centralized C2 over information operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian C2 over internal security/emergency response is clearly challenged by the scale of the Pushkino fire. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Under severe pressure from continuous KABs and missile threats, particularly in Kharkiv. The continued air alert for Sumy indicates ongoing AD activity and readiness. Munitions expenditure is high. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Services: Severely strained by the constant need to respond to civilian casualties and infrastructure damage in Kharkiv (40+ injured, 1 fatality) and potentially in Ternopil (large fire response). Their continued operation despite severe conditions demonstrates high readiness and resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Drone Operations: Maintain high effectiveness in deep strikes (SBU "Operation Pavutina") and tactical engagements (Ukrainian General Staff video). The use of drones for PSYOPs (e.g., messages on ordnance) indicates adaptability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ground Forces: Maintaining defensive posture in Kharkiv. Actively conducting offensive operations and PSYOPs on the Kursk direction, demonstrating capability to cross the border and apply pressure directly. Actively engaging Russian forces on all axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Information Operations: Actively countering Russian narratives by immediately reporting on civilian casualties and KAB strikes in Kharkiv, and highlighting deep strike successes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Continued Deep Strike Capability: SBU's FPV drone strike on Tu-22M3 bomber and the confirmed impact on Kstovo refinery (a modern processing unit) remain major strategic successes, demonstrating unprecedented deep strike capabilities and forcing Russia to divert/relocate high-value assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Offensive Pressure on Kursk Axis: Ukrainian General Staff video confirms active operations in the Kursk direction, including artillery and drone strikes, indicating a proactive posture to draw Russian reserves and punish cross-border shelling. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • High Interception Rate: Successful neutralization of 174 of 215 aerial targets nationwide (previous report) despite saturation attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Setbacks:
  • Increased Civilian Casualties and Terror: One fatality (head of Children's Railway) and over 40 injured in Kharkiv due to KAB strikes. This is a severe humanitarian setback and a successful Russian psychological operation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russian Claims of Equipment Losses: Russian claims of destroying Ukrainian tanks (Kupyansk) and a "Bohdana" howitzer (Vremevsky) indicate continued losses on the battlefield. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claims)
  • Area Denial (PFM-1 Mines): Russian use of PFM-1 anti-personnel landmines in urban areas creates a persistent civilian and military hazard, complicating movement and increasing risk of injury. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare Impact: Russian disinformation regarding body exchanges and claiming Ukraine refuses to accept them is gaining traction and could undermine public trust, despite Ukrainian rebuttals. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Potential Logistics Hit: The claimed Russian strike on a Western ammunition bunker in Ternopil, if verified, would represent a significant logistical setback in Western Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of target, but significant fire observed)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: Continued high expenditure due to persistent aerial attacks, particularly KABs and massed drone assaults. Requires sustained resupply from international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Response Resources: Severe strain on emergency and medical services in Kharkiv due to increased casualties and widespread damage, compounded by response to deep rear incidents like Ternopil fire. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Personnel and Equipment for Ground Forces: High intensity combat on multiple axes (Donetsk, Sumy, Kupyansk) and ongoing losses will strain personnel and equipment reserves, especially specialized armor and artillery. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Mine Clearance Capabilities: Increased Russian use of PFM-1 mines will require specialized mine clearance equipment and personnel to ensure safe passage for civilians and military operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Propaganda (Internal & External):
  • Amplified Body Exchange Disinformation: Margarita Simonyan, Dnevnik Desantnika, and MoD Deputy Minister Fomin are all coordinating to push the narrative that Ukraine refuses to accept bodies of its fallen, blaming them for delays to avoid compensation. This is a highly aggressive and emotionally charged disinformation campaign. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Highlighting "Successes" and "Buffer Zones": Russian milbloggers (Basurin, Kotenok, Voin DV) continue to disseminate content highlighting Russian military efforts, including BDA videos (tank, Bohdana SPA), and claims of tactical gains (Sumy "buffer zone expansion"). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Exploiting Internal Western Discord: Russian channels are actively exploiting statements by Western political figures (Trump's comments on Musk) and internal US security concerns (Starlink) to create narratives of Western disunity and undermine international support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Propaganda/Information Operations:
  • Transparency on Russian Atrocities: Ukrainian officials (Zelenskiy, Oleh Syniehubov, Operational ZSU) and media (RBC-Ukraine, STERNENKO) are immediately reporting on KAB strikes on civilian areas in Kharkiv, providing real-time video/photo evidence of civilian casualties and damage to children's railway and recreational park. This directly counters Russian narratives of "precision strikes" and highlights Russian terrorism. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Highlighting Strategic and Tactical Successes: SBU's deep strike video on the Tu-22M3 bomber and the General Staff's video showcasing Kursk operations are powerful information operations, demonstrating advanced capabilities, boosting morale, and signaling resolve. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Refuting Disinformation: Ukrainian authorities are consistently refuting Russian claims regarding the body exchange, but the sheer volume of Russian propaganda requires sustained effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Negative Impact: The escalating KAB strikes on Kharkiv, particularly on civilian recreational areas, will severely impact civilian morale due to increased casualties and psychological trauma. The reported fatality of the head of the Children's Railway and the rising injury count amplify this. The use of PFM-1 mines further increases civilian fear and disruption. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Positive Impact: The confirmation of the SBU's deep strike on a Tu-22M3 bomber and the visible proactive operations in the Kursk direction are significant morale boosts for Ukrainian forces and the population, demonstrating a concrete ability to strike back at Russian strategic assets and take the fight to Russian territory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Information Warfare Impact: The Russian disinformation campaign regarding body exchanges is highly corrosive and, if not effectively countered, could create distrust and frustration among Ukrainian families awaiting news of their missing, potentially impacting overall societal morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Russian disinformation regarding body exchanges could aim to undermine international trust in Ukraine as a negotiating partner. However, the clear and verifiable targeting of civilians in Kharkiv provides a strong counter-narrative, likely solidifying international condemnation of Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The unprecedented deep strike on a strategic bomber by SBU will likely garner significant international attention and may influence future military aid discussions, highlighting Ukraine's innovative asymmetric capabilities and justifying continued support for deep strike platforms. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Discussions regarding Starlink's potential security risks to the US (WP report) could create friction with Elon Musk, but direct military implications for Ukraine's Starlink usage remain unclear at this time. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Politico's report on new US sanctions against Russia indicates ongoing international pressure, though concerns about trade partners highlight the complexities of sustained economic warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• MLCOA 1: Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers and Deeper Targets, with Focus on Psychological Impact and Logistics: Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia, with an explicit focus on civilian targets (e.g., parks, residential areas) to maximize terror and drain Ukrainian emergency resources. Simultaneously, Russia will increase retaliatory deep strikes against military logistics (e.g., ammunition depots, rail lines) and critical infrastructure in Western and Central Ukraine (e.g., Ternopil), aiming to disrupt Ukrainian supply chains and war-making capacity. This will be coupled with continued large-scale disinformation campaigns.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Continued KAB strikes on Kharkiv with rising civilian casualties, Zelenskiy's confirmed "terror" targeting, claimed Ternopil strike, persistent missile/drone threat in Sumy, coordinated Russian body exchange narrative.

• MLCOA 2: Intensified Ground Offensives on Sumy and Donetsk Axes, with Integrated Air/Drone Support, Enhanced Area Denial Tactics, and Targeted Counter-UAV/Anti-Artillery Measures: Russian forces will press harder on the Sumy axis, attempting to exploit tactical gains and threaten Sumy city, forcing Ukraine to divert significant reserves. They will maintain intense pressure on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk, Chasiv Yar) with heavy KAB/artillery support. Russia will increasingly integrate air support (KABs), artillery, and FPV drones, while actively employing PFM-1 anti-personnel mines in contested urban areas and targeting Ukrainian armor and artillery assets (e.g., claimed Bohdana destruction) to facilitate their advances. Defensive actions in border regions will escalate if Ukrainian pressure continues.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Russian claims of expanding buffer zone in Sumy, active advances towards Sumy (within 20km), use of PFM-1 mines in urban areas, claimed destruction of Ukrainian armor/artillery, continued high number of combat engagements on Donetsk axis, established Russian fortifications in Krasnolimanskoye direction indicating preparedness.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• MDCOA 1: Strategic Breakthrough on Sumy Axis and Attempted Encirclement of Sumy City, Supported by Overwhelming Air Dominance and Coordinated Deep Sabotage and Cyber Attacks: Russia commits significant additional reserves to the Sumy axis, executing a rapid, decisive breakthrough aimed at encircling or seizing Sumy city, potentially using overwhelming combined arms force and deep strikes to neutralize Ukrainian command and control and air defenses. This would aim to open a new major operational front, fix a large portion of Ukrainian reserves, and create a significant humanitarian crisis. This would be coupled with intensified cyber attacks and sabotage to disrupt Ukrainian C2 and logistics in critical rear areas.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Increased due to confirmed advances within 20km of Sumy and persistent Russian rhetoric of "buffer zone expansion")
  • Indicators: Sustained high rate of KABs and missile strikes on deep targets, large-scale troop movements on Sumy axis beyond current levels, confirmed significant increase in Russian EW/cyber activity, intelligence of Russian force restructuring or redeployment from other axes.

• MDCOA 2: Sustained and Crippling Strikes on Critical National Infrastructure (Energy, Logistics Hubs, Strategic Aviation) to Collapse Ukrainian Civilian Resilience and War-Making Capacity: Russia launches a coordinated, multi-wave missile and drone campaign targeting Ukraine's remaining energy infrastructure ahead of winter, major logistics hubs (rail, road junctions, especially those for Western aid), and strategic aviation assets (airfields, repair facilities). This would aim to directly cripple Ukraine's ability to sustain military operations and civilian life on a broader scale, potentially exploiting perceived AD munitions shortages.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Increased due to recent claimed deep strike on Ternopil and the large internal fire in Pushkino, suggesting potential for similar external targeting)
  • Indicators: Intensified missile/drone attacks beyond current levels, targeting of energy infrastructure components not previously hit, significant increase in Russian strategic bomber activity.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 24-48 Hours (Short-Term):

  • Immediate Retaliation/Sustained Attacks: Expect continued, possibly intensified, KAB and missile strikes on Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. High probability of further Russian retaliatory deep strikes following the Tu-22M3 destruction and Kursk operations.
  • Ground Pressure: Continued tactical ground engagements, particularly on the Donetsk and Sumy axes. Increased Russian counter-drone and anti-AD operations, and likely further use of PFM-1 mines.
  • Decision Point (UKR): Prioritize air defense assets to protect key urban centers (Kharkiv, Sumy) and critical infrastructure. Expedite deployment of countermeasures to Russian anti-drone tactics and develop rapid response for mine clearance in urban areas.

• Next 72 Hours (Medium-Term):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Assess the full extent of damage to the Tu-22M3 bomber and the claimed Ternopil ammunition bunker. Evaluate potential for further SBU deep strikes and the necessary resources. Re-evaluate and adapt ground force deployments on the Sumy axis based on continued Russian advances and the scale of the threat to Sumy city. Develop a comprehensive plan for mine clearance and public safety in areas affected by PFM-1 mines.

• Next 1 Week (Near-Term Strategic):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the overall effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strike campaign on Russian military-industrial complex and logistics, considering both successes and Russian claims of countermeasures. Continue to optimize air defense deployments based on evolving Russian targeting patterns. Intensify intelligence collection on Russian strategic aviation, air defense assets, and potential dispersal efforts. Prioritize resources for the Sumy axis if Russian pressure continues.

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Reinforce and Optimize Air Defense for Urban Centers and Key Infrastructure (Immediate):

   • Action: Immediately re-prioritize and reinforce layered air defense systems (including mobile fire groups with MANPADS for KAB and drone defense) to protect Kharkiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia from continued KAB and missile attacks. Deploy active and passive defenses around critical civilian infrastructure like recreational parks, railway stations, and administrative buildings.
   • Justification: Russian forces are deliberately escalating attacks on civilian areas to inflict casualties and psychological impact, requiring enhanced immediate protection. The high civilian casualty count in Kharkiv necessitates this.
   • Intelligence Gap: Precise real-time air defense munition expenditure rates in affected areas.
   • Collection Requirement: Automated tracking of AD engagements and munition usage, updated imagery of damaged civilian sites for munition analysis.

2. Mitigate and Counter Russian Area Denial Tactics (Urgent):

   • Action: Disseminate intelligence on Russian use of PFM-1 anti-personnel landmines in urban areas to all relevant military units and civilian emergency services. Develop and deploy rapid mine clearance capabilities (e.g., remote-controlled vehicles, specialized teams) to affected areas. Initiate immediate public awareness campaigns for civilians on mine hazards and reporting procedures.
   • Justification: The use of PFM-1 mines poses a persistent threat to civilians and complicates friendly ground operations, requiring specialized countermeasures.
   • Intelligence Gap: Specific delivery methods for PFM-1 mines, and precise locations of affected areas.
   • Collection Requirement: HUMINT from local sources, IMINT/OSINT for mine detection, technical analysis of munition remnants.

3. Capitalize on Deep Strike Success and Prepare for Retaliation (Urgent):

   • Action: Conduct rapid, detailed BDA on the Tu-22M3 at Belaya airfield (satellite imagery, OSINT analysis) to confirm damage and operational impact. Publicize the success widely to boost morale and demonstrate capability. Simultaneously, prepare for heightened Russian retaliatory strikes across Ukraine, particularly on strategic infrastructure, following the Tu-22M3 and claimed Ternopil hits.
   • Justification: Ukrainian deep strikes are a significant strategic success but will provoke severe retaliation, requiring preemptive defensive measures.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full BDA and long-term operational impact on the Tu-22M3 and claimed Ternopil target.
   • Collection Requirement: High-resolution satellite imagery of Belaya airfield and other Russian airfields/logistics hubs, monitoring Russian strategic aviation movements and activity.

4. Strengthen Defensive Lines and Monitor Russian Intent on the Sumy Axis (Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately reinforce personnel, fortifications, and anti-tank capabilities on the Sumy axis, prioritizing areas within 20km of Sumy city and identified Russian avenues of advance. Intensify ISR collection on Russian force composition, strength, and objectives in the area. Advise civilian authorities on potential evacuation routes and shelter options in Sumy City and surrounding settlements. Conduct aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery supporting advances.
   • Justification: Russian claims of an "expanding buffer zone" and confirmed advances indicate a serious intent to press the Sumy axis, threatening Sumy City.
   • Intelligence Gap: Precise composition and strength of Russian forces on Sumy axis, and their immediate operational objectives.
   • Collection Requirement: HUMINT from local sources, SIGINT on Russian communications, IMINT for troop movements and fortifications.

5. Counter Russian Information Operations on Body Exchange and Battlefield Narratives (Ongoing):

   • Action: Proactively and transparently communicate Ukraine's official stance and actions regarding prisoner and body exchanges to both domestic and international audiences, providing verifiable evidence and consistently refuting Russian disinformation. Highlight Russian violations of international law (e.g., use of PFM-1 mines, targeting of civilian areas) to discredit their humanitarian claims. Actively disseminate content on Ukrainian successes (deep strikes, Kursk operations) and Russian atrocities (Kharkiv KABs on civilians) to shape the information environment.
   • Justification: Russia is leveraging highly sensitive humanitarian issues for information warfare, aiming to undermine Ukrainian credibility and international support. Effective counter-narratives are critical.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full scope of Russian information narratives targeting Ukrainian society, and the specific impact of Russian propaganda on Ukrainian public and troop morale.
   • Collection Requirement: Comprehensive monitoring of Russian state media and milblogger channels, and analysis of their messaging tactics.

---

END REPORT

Previous Report (2025-06-07 16:43:16Z)